Talk:Cyclone Olaf
Latest comment: 18 years ago by Coredesat in topic Failed "good article" nomination
 | Cyclone Olaf was a Natural sciences good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment
editReduced to start because this is in drastic need of some reorganization and copyediting. Strongly recommend delisting from GAN since there is no cite web formatting. --Coredesat 04:56, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, I went on and failed it, for the reasons below. --Coredesat 05:06, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Failed "good article" nomination
editThis article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of October 21, 2006, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Fail, needs a thorough copyedit. There is also speculation ("it could have been worse if it hit American Samoa directly").
- 2. Factually accurate?: Fail, no cite web-formatted references
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Eh, weak pass
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
- 5. Article stability? Pass
- 6. Images?: Fail due to lack of organization.
When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration. Thanks for your work so far. --Coredesat 05:06, 21 October 2006 (UTC)