Talk:Custody and repatriation

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Repetitive frivolous references to other countries

edit
  • ...or aliens who commit crimes, in other countries including the United States [1]...
  • In China as well as other countries such as the U.S....
  • As in many other countries, Chinese law does not provide for constitutional judicial review, and, as in systems without a constitution as the UK...

These references are frivolous and do not appear to add to the article. They attempt to reference commonality - stretching, sometimes - without demonstrating any point. In an article on a controversial practice in one country, it seems like a half-hearted attempt to justify that practice. This is as far out of place in this article as references to China would be in an article on deportation of migrant workers in the US. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.240.243.170 (talk) 19:04, 22 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

My thoughts exactly. I propose to remove the two paragraphs containing the offending materialRMHZombie (talk) 00:52, 27 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Custody and repatriation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:15, 3 December 2016 (UTC)Reply