Talk:Curfew (band)
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Citations
editWhen citations are needed it's generally accepted to mean 3rd party citations. A band stating they invented a genre then referencing their own website is not a valid citation. WebHamster 20:37, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
This has been rectified and re-worded to (hopefully) comply with citations. Booglamay 20:50, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
- Fair enough, but something to think about... if they are described as having a Weather Report-like sound then they are hardly pioneers if they sound like other older bands. WebHamster 21:23, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
True - but pioneers or not, bands always have and always will be compared to others - especially in an album review. Besides, the statement was made regarding the performance and production processes (the final sentence of the introductory paragraph backs this up) rather than the "sound" of the soungs. The reference to this issue ("2. Curfew define the 'Electric Jazz' genre") describes this in more detail. Cheers. Booglamay 22:24, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Curfew (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080411040112/http://www.daveohiggins.com/pages/biography.htm to http://www.daveohiggins.com/pages/biography.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070827000947/http://www.nickandrew.net/news.htm to http://www.nickandrew.net/news.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070827000947/http://www.nickandrew.net/news.htm to http://www.nickandrew.net/news.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:16, 15 August 2017 (UTC)