Talk:Cultural consumer
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cultural consumer article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I don't know how anybody else feels about this article
editNot sure if this article is needed (notability) - and the majority of it sounds like an advertisement or editorial. I would nominate this article for deletion, however I don't know how anybody else feels about this article... - Temeku (07/18/2014, 3:12 PM PDT)
Nominated for deletion. The consumerism article contains sufficient information on this topic already. - 413bec (17/10/2018, 9:57 AM GMT)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Cultural consumer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100217124451/http://blog.ogilvypr.com:80/2008/01/the-cultural-consumer/ to http://blog.ogilvypr.com/2008/01/the-cultural-consumer/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:29, 30 January 2016 (UTC)