External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crichton Castle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:37, 14 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Removing article from "Haunted" category due to lack of relevant content edit

This article was included in Category:Reportedly haunted locations in Scotland. However, as far as I can see the article as it stands makes no reference to any ghost sightings, supernatural legends or other paranormal activity associated with Crichton Castle which would justify it being in the category. Given this I have taken the article out of the category for now. Of course if someone subsequently adds material from reliable sources which demonstrates that there have been claims of hauntings/ghosts/poltergeists/paranormal activities associated with the Crichton Castle which should be included in the article for notability reasons, then they are more than welcome to put it back in the category at that time. Dunarc (talk) 17:59, 26 September 2019 (UTC)Reply