Talk:Convolvulaceae

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 1.38.184.79 in topic Scienc


"Convolvulaceae" is plural

edit

I reverted the change back to a singular verb because in scientific nomenclature, all names above genus are treated as plural. The subject of the first sentence is Convolvulaceae, not family or group. It is considered improper to say "Convolvulaceae is..."

One way around this is to include the taxon category, which would render it singular. So, "the family Convolvulaceae is..." would be proper. However, this is edging toward mention as opposed to use, which is more the province of dictionaries and technical manuals concerned with the name rather than the organisms the name refers to (see Use-mention distinction).

Also, it is generally discouraged among taxonomists to put the article "the" in front of a taxon name. Admittedly, it is possible to find lots of examples in the literature and in other encyclopedias of incorrect usage of scientific nomenclature. I think we can do better.

If you disagree with this analysis, I am happy to discuss it and would be happy to provide references. Thanks.Michaplot (talk) 09:16, 5 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Convolvulaceae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:41, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Convolvulaceae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Sciens

edit

Cuscuya 1.38.184.79 (talk) 15:13, 8 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Scienc

edit

Chepatar 1 1.38.184.79 (talk) 15:15, 8 October 2022 (UTC)Reply