Talk:Converged infrastructure

Untitled

A Google search for scholarly papers on "IT infrastructure convergence" turns up this Q & A. https://www.infosecisland.com/blogview/6023-Converged-Infrastructure-Means-Endless-Possibilities.html and it might be used to provide a sited reference/source for technical and business efficiencies as stated here: Converged infrastructure provides both technical and business efficiencies, according to industry researchers and observers. Happyinmaine (talk) 19:16, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

I wouldnt classify the above reference as "scholarly", more of an HP PR Piece — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martinjoz (talk • contribs) 05:06, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

{{Cleanup|date=August 2011}} This page has advertising in it for a HP (Hewlett-Packard) product. Guidelines FAQs state:

May I advertise my organization or its campaigns, clients, products, services or leading individuals on Wikipedia?Shortcut: WP:BFAQ#ADVERT

No. Wikipedia is not a place for you to post promotional material for your services, products or to promote any other cause outside of its own mission to deliver the sum total of human knowledge about notable subjects. While a list of the notable services your organization provides might be appropriate, such a list should only include those that are a part of the primary mission and are necessary to adequately describe the organization. Our policy on neutral point of view mandates that promotional material and advertising be removed. Advertising may be in addition considered spam and will likely lead to penalties such as blocking or even banning.

The HP specific text should be removed, because they are only one company out of many that provide converged infrastructure products. They should not be advertising a product on this page.

Ugh, this article seems a pile of advertising buzzwords and jargon. As far as I can tell, the term is just a modern name for the idea of selling all computer, networking, and data storage products from a single vendor. Should make that clear I hope, instead of trying to obfuscate and make it seem there is some new technology here. It is really a marketing term. W Nowicki (talk) 19:44, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Note from an anon: The following reference is a dead link. Broderick, Katherine and Scaramella, Jed. "Considering All of IT: Converged Infrastructure Survey Findings," IDC, June 2010 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:3006:5:34E0:21AD:7FB2:988D:2DED (talk) 12:25, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:13, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Removed tags on references and quote farm as these issues have been addressed. Happyinmaine (talk) 17:16, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Converged infrastructure. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721082056/http://www.cio.co.ke/Opinion-and-Analysis/your-next-it-budget-6-ways-to-support-business-growth.html to http://www.cio.co.ke/Opinion-and-Analysis/your-next-it-budget-6-ways-to-support-business-growth.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111207010216/http://www.techjournalsouth.com/2011/05/many-data-centers-running-out-of-space-this-year-or-next/ to http://www.techjournalsouth.com/2011/05/many-data-centers-running-out-of-space-this-year-or-next/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:29, 12 August 2017 (UTC)