Talk:Constructivism (psychological school)

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Ocdnctx in topic Could we get a non-circular definition?

Needs non-cryptic writing, e.g., replace "to language" with something a non-specialist would understand edit

I don't know what the verb "to language" means and I doubt 99.9% of the people you're trying to explain this to would. Could you choose another verb or explain the meaning of this neologism please? Or is constructivism some kind of cult with its own secret language? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.230.245.20 (talk) 03:15, 2 May 2008‎ (UTC)Reply

Could we get a non-circular definition? edit

"In psychology, constructivism concerns the world of constructivist psychologies."

Could that be replaced with a non-circular explanation?

The rest of article also needs rewriting into prose accessible by someone not already familiar with the subject matter.

Ocdnctx (talk) 01:12, 26 July 2012 (UTC)Reply