Talk:Constitution of South Carolina

Untitled

Is it just me or is Article I, Section 17 a bit strange? Thanx 68.39.174.230 00:17, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

Heh, that it is. – Illegitimate Barrister 11:04, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

That it tis, that it tis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.131.118.221 (talk) 22:33, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Constitution of South Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130819222919/http://scstatehouse.gov/scconstitution/a11.php to http://www.scstatehouse.gov/scconstitution/a11.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:07, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi

Um hi 🙂 172.112.3.214 (talk) 04:36, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Constitution of 1778 - Established Religion

By my reading of the cited constitution (footnote 1), it is not quite accurate to say "all of the preexisting Protestant congregations being amalgamated into a single denomination but denied financial support," rather, they state that each denomination is still recognized as its own respective denomination, just that all Christian Protestant bodies are recognized as representing the established religion of the state, that being Protestantism. 50.225.226.196 (talk) 19:39, 28 February 2024 (UTC)