This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The article does not even say how long the Democrats have controlled the State Legislature in Connecticut.176.26.75.7 (talk) 09:42, 2 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
I agree this isn't a very useful article. So what happened at 1818? No notable historical events happened after 1818? I wanted to read about what impact the "one man one vote" ruling had on the ConnectiCan't Legislature. The ruling was in 1964. I am sure this must have been in the article at one time, but someone took a meat-ax to the historical section. Maybe the history was taken out because it was written in a far too politically biased manner? If so maybe starting over from scratch is the best solution rather than resurrecting biased entries. --2600:6C65:747F:CD3F:5CA:DBC6:8334:90A9 (talk) 12:39, 27 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
