Talk:Confessionalism (politics)

confessionalism in the Netherlands

The reference to the Netherlands seems rather disturbing. Most countries have some confessional political parties - but this does far from make the political system confessionalist. If no objections I will delete the sentence. Bertilvidet 17:16, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Liberalism - liberal, confessionalism - confessional sounded logical to me. Moreover both the Confessional entries say nothing about christian democracy and I wanted to put the information somewhere. To me knowledge only the Dutch refer to their parties as confessional, atleast as far as the evidendence on wikipedia tells me. But if you feel strongly about this removed it.

BTW can you provide me with any links to academic sources on this use of the term confessionalism?

--C mon 21:22, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

You don't remove things because you "feel strongly" about them, that's what's wrong with WP. Things are either right or wrong, it's not how they make you feel. This article has been unfixable for so long maybe it should be removed.--Cuthbert Bargepole (talk) 21:52, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Regardless of whether or not the section is relevant, this sentence doesn't make sense:

"A traditional norm in society, extending to many facets of cultural life, termed pillarisation."

not sure if it was meant to be "is termed pillarisation", or the sentence was cut in the middle. NourEhsan (talk) 09:02, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Northern Ireland

Should the proposed political dispensation in Northern Ireland under the Good-Friday Agreement be classified as a form of confessionalism. --Gramscis cousin 13:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

I think the Bertilvidet has it -- countries that have confessional parties don't necessarily have political systems that match this definition of 'confessionalism'. As for N. Ireland, the Good Friday Agreement tends to be referred to as consociational. Even if 'confessionalism' is really a valid label for a political system, I'm not sure N. Ireland would count. While the fault lines are along religious lines, the issues are political (republicanism vs unionism) rather than centered around any religious questions.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.15.188.127 (talk • contribs)

I think N Ireland should at least be noted in this article. IMO it does satisfy the criteria for Confessionalism, but in any case let the reader decide by linking appropriately. Fig (talk) 14:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Confessionalism (politics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.islamitischdemocratischepartij.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:46, 31 March 2016 (UTC)