edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Conch (people). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:23, 11 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Conch (people). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:36, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Standards for writing Conchs-- capitalization, quotation marks, etc

edit

I think Conch should be capitalized and written without quotation marks. Okie, Aussie, Tar Heel, and other informal demonyms across Wikipedia follow this standard. Conch is a widely used term referring to the historic Bahamian immigrants and the people of Key West today. In its common usage, it is capitalized and written without quotation marks. Kwhistorica (talk) 16:40, 7 December 2021 (UTC)kwhistoricaReply

Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Words as words, where Conch is being discussed as a word, it should either be in italics or quoted, with italics generally preferred. Where Conch is referring to people, it should be capitalized and neither in italics nor quoted. When I started this article 15 years ago, I was not yet clear on that rule, and used italics and quotes inconsistently when discussing the term Conch. There have been changes in the article to the punctuation used with the term since then, but the usage remains inconsistent. I will make some changes in line with my understanding of the MOS section. - Donald Albury 18:16, 7 December 2021 (UTC)Reply