Talk:Comparison of World War I tanks
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Hengistmate in topic Amendments
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This is a terrible table. GraemeLeggett 10:32, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Money where mouth is, it is getting better. GraemeLeggett
- It was an extended labour and painful childbirth... Tank history needs more help, too. —Michael Z. 2005-03-21 16:10 Z
Origin of table edit
It seems to my eyes that this table was lifted wholeheartedly from the Site given as source. GraemeLeggett
- I haven't seen the original (just tried to fix up the table), but I believe that raw data are not copyrightable. Unless we've substantially copied some additional creative work by the author; I think this is okay. —Michael Z. 2005-03-21 16:08 Z
- The layout however poor was someome's work. Its evolving anyhow. GraemeLeggett
Amendments edit
I've done as many as my head can take for the time being. It needs the Mk II & III. Need to double-check number of m.g. per vehicle. The 24 infantry in the Mk V* was theoretical. The A7V armour wasn't mild steel. Have taken "Date Introduced" to mean "In Action." Not included U.S. M1917, since it wasn't used; probably needs footnote. Saint-Chamond title boxes need combining - the differences were superficial. More to come. Hengistmate (talk) 06:08, 23 February 2012 (UTC)