Talk:Church–Rosser theorem

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Mathematics Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Distinct vs possibly empty sequence of reductions edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

We say, "The Church–Rosser theorem states that if there are two distinct reductions starting from the same lambda calculus term, then there exists a term that is reachable via a (possibly empty) sequence of reductions from both reducts."

If the reducts are distinct, how can there exist a term that is reachable by an empty sequence of reductions? — Matt Crypto 09:20, 26 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

What's the problem? Two distinct reductions could end at the same term. Or two reductions could end at terms a and b where b can be reduced to a by further reductions; then the common reachable term is a, and the reduction sequence from a is empty.

The only misstatement I see is grammatical; it should say "from each reduct". —Dominus (talk) 00:59, 28 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic