Talk:Chrysler Imperial Parade Phaeton

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Jtnet in topic Title of article

Title of article

edit

The title of this article is incorrect. It should technically be named Imperial Parade Phaeton because as of 1955, there was no such thing as a "Chrysler Imperial" (as a new vehicle), just Imperial, which had become a stand-alone marque.

(As a compromise, it could be called "Chrysler's Imperial Parade Phaeton", although it's a cop-out; no one would say "GM's Cadillac" or "Ford's Lincoln".)

Jtnet (talk) 13:29, 11 April 2018 (UTC)Reply