Talk:Christian Volckman
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Comment edit
renaisance has no rotoscoping, it uses motion capture, entirely diffrent methods. the end characters resemble the actors in movement only, unlike in rotoscoping where original footage is edited in a similar way to photoshoping an image so does convey resemblance to original actors
Biography assessment rating comment edit
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article.-- Jreferee 18:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Characterizing critical reception edit
Renaissance got mixed reviews -- IMDB reviews are in a bell curve around 7, Meta-critic gives a 5.6, and taking any sample from the linked list of media-outlet reviews at http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0386741/externalreviews yields both positive and negative reactions, sometimes in the same review.
The usual style is to characterize a set of reviews like this as 'mixed'. One obvious alternative is to say 'critical reaction was both positive and negative' or something, but that seems an awkward construction compared to 'mixed'. cshirky (talk) 22:51, 1 March 2017 (UTC)