This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Chris Dawson (governor) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Change to Chris Dawson (governor), given his recent appointment?
Compusolus (talk) 09:40, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I agree this page should be moved. The role of governor is much more notable than the role of police commissioner. Steelkamp (talk) 10:00, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Proposal to add his official photo to the infoboxedit
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi Ryanisvibing. There doesn't appear to be any information on that website about the rights for that image, therefore we have to assume that all rights are reserved by government house, i.e. we can't use the photo because it doesn't have a licence compatible with Wikipedia. Steelkamp (talk) 13:23, 12 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=logo}
