Talk:China Geological Survey
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the China Geological Survey article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
Untitled
editThis organization is a major organization, influencing China's economic management. Furthermore, many notable Paleontologists have worked for them. They have an interesting and close history with human evolution investigation. Canadianism 01:11, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- Excellent! Can you add some of what you know about it into the article please? Thanks! Owen× ☎ 01:20, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: ERTH 4303 Resources of the Earth
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 January 2023 and 15 April 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Haoyu Cui (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Naeim9146, Kristen112211, Shanleighkirk.
— Assignment last updated by ChloejWard (talk) 03:39, 15 April 2023 (UTC) Peer review China Geological Survey
Clarity
The lead section is clear and concise. It provides readers with a captivating brief introduction to the topic. The author could improve the lead section's clarity by outlining what will be explored in the article.
Structure:
The article is well organized, and relevant information is easily found. The information provided follows an appropriate flow. I would have offered additional content for the also see section to improve structure.
Neutrality
The authors kept a neutral tone throughout the article, and there are no claims that appear to be biased, nor do they attempt to persuade the audition toward one viewpoint. However, there is only one reference provided in order to provide multiple view points, I would include information from a variety of sources.
Cover and balance:
Since the lead section does not provide an overview of the content, it is hard to judge where the author will include a variety of topics. In order to improve this aspect, I would include a variety of topics at equal lengths and provide relevant topics that capture different perspectives.
Sources and references.
The author only provides one reference. There should be a plethora of resources from ranging sources. It is imperative to provide information from various resources to ensure the article encapsulates diverse perspectives and topics. I would improve the reference section by including sources from peer-reviewed journals, governmental organizations and news outlets. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kristen112211 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 2 March 2023 (UTC)