Talk:Chaucer School, Canterbury

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 86.177.210.141 in topic "Partially selective'

Info edit

I have Added some information on the new college system and also added some headers to make it look a bit more professional. i will continue updating this later Dragpyre (talk) 20:50, 12 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Closing edit

I am on holiday and not in a position to properly edit to include this news just reported by the BBC and Kent Online http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-26336455 OneHappyHusky (talk) 17:04, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

No problem, please enjoy your holiday and add it when you get back. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 20:54, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chaucer School, Canterbury. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:18, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chaucer School, Canterbury. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:02, 3 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

"Partially selective' edit

This isn't correct for most of the school's lifetime. While it was the Canterbury Technical High School for Boys and then the Geoffrey Chaucer School it only took pupils who had passed the local '11 plus' exams ("Kent Tests'). Only after a name change, I think to 'Chaucer Technology School' or similar, did it change the intake criteria. In the context of the Kent education system, I don't think there have ever been 'comprehensive' schools, only secondary modern or grammar schools, with a sprinkling of the curious 'technical grammars' like this one. 86.177.210.141 (talk) 19:27, 20 October 2021 (UTC)Reply