Talk:Charles Legéndy

Learn more about this page

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 17 October 2018 by reviewer DGG (talk · contribs).

Unreliable source template edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I think I took care of the "unreliable source" message - this new reference should be much better. Journal of Neuroscience Methods is a pretty solid publication. And the Gourévitch-Eggermont article I am now citing contains the statement "..the most famous method of burst detection remains the Poisson surprise (PS) method.." and includes the citation of the Legéndy-Salcman paper. Crlegendy (talk) 14:14, 4 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Approval of draft edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I approved his draft because I think it has a reasonable chance of passing AfD. Anyone may of course challenge it--only the community can decide. I remain uncertain about the relative weight to be given his neurobiological work, bit I;'ve done as much cleanup on this as I'm going to. DGG ( talk ) 18:49, 17 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic