Talk:Chariton

Two Articles in One?

I don't want to immediately edit this page (though if no interest/argument is made against my doing so, I shall), but surely the entry for Chaereas and Callirhoe should be entirely separate from this entry on Chariton himself (much as with Xenophon of Ephesus and his Ephesian Tale)? -> Wiper 17:24, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Title of the novel

I have been presumptuous enough to change the title of his novel, where referenced, from "the loves of Chaereas and Challirhoe" to simply "Chaereas and Challirhoe", in keeping with the standard name attributed to the novel. If anyone would care to give a valid reason that this should not be acceptable, please make it known! -> Wiper 17:24, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chariton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050828070658/http://www.chss.montclair.edu:80/classics/petron/CHARITON.HTML to http://www.chss.montclair.edu/classics/petron/CHARITON.HTML

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Christian interest

Is it worth mentioning that part of this story has interested scholars of early Christianity, because of its several similarities to the possibly contemporaneous gospel accounts of the empty tomb of Jesus? HuPi (talk) 23:57, 2 February 2022 (UTC)