Talk:Chal Pichchur Banate Hain

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Ravensfire in topic Article review and possible clean-up needed

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chal Pichchur Banate Hain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:57, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Article review and possible clean-up needed edit

As discussed at ANI several accounts and IP users involved in creating and heavily-editing this article appear to be related to the subject and have a conflict of interest. The article therefore needs to be reviewed by independent editors for potential sourcing and POV issues. Abecedare (talk) 15:23, 19 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

@Abecedare: The plot section looks like a direct copy from IMDB, but it has been there for years. Is there a way to tell if the IMDB was copied from here, or vice versa? PohranicniStraze (talk) 00:17, 20 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
This version of the WP article from 2014 predates this 2016 version of the IMDB summary, which is the earliest that I can find. -- Hoary (talk) 03:51, 20 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
The plot in essentially the current form was added to the wikipedia article on August 7th 2002 2012 by User:Fridaymoviez, a month before the movie was even released! So I don't think this is a case of copyvio, but one of the film's producers/publicists creating and maintaining this page. If someone is willing to put in the effort the page should be rewritten;if not it would be better to stub it to include the basic verifiable facts and information that is supported by the cited sources. Abecedare (talk) 04:55, 20 August 2018 (UTC) (Fix typo in year. Abecedare (talk) 18:12, 20 August 2018 (UTC) )Reply
Good sleuthing there, Abecedare. No major effort from me on this one, sorry. I wouldn't mind if it were stubbed. -- Hoary (talk) 06:04, 20 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
No issues from me about stubbing it. What's in there now is still pretty obvious promotional editing. Just look at the descriptions in the cast section, and the amount of stuff in the lead. Ravensfire (talk) 18:23, 20 August 2018 (UTC)Reply