Talk:Central Theatre (New York City)

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City: Theatre Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York City/Theatre (assessed as Low-importance).

Tweaks edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Romberg and Gerber wrote together, like Rodgers and Hart. Do you think that is sufficiently clear in the text? Also, the reason I place the comma within the target is I think it looks better before the "external link" symbol in the result than after. Vzeebjtf (talk) 10:17, 24 April 2014 (UTC) I mean within the link; sorry. Vzeebjtf (talk) 10:18, 24 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

I just now clarified the first point. As to the placement of the comma, you did not do it consistently throughout the article, so I just made it consistent in the way you describe, even though I think it looks better the other way. But you should read WP:CITEVAR, which says that you should not change something like that, if it is already done differently throughout an existing article. All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 14:05, 24 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I'm wondering how you feel about list-defined refs; I gather you don't care for them, since you didn't use them here. I think with a lot of long refs - e.g., those with urls - it makes editing easier. Vzeebjtf (talk) 14:32, 24 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

By list-defined refs, do you mean when you put all the refs at the bottom of the edit screen with a target in the text? Yes, I hate them! I feel strongly that they discourage editing by newbies, and also by many experienced editors, including me. -- Ssilvers (talk) 15:14, 24 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Well, that settles that. :) Vzeebjtf (talk) 16:24, 24 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic