Talk:Center for High Impact Philanthropy

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philadelphia Low‑importance

	Philadelphia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

University of Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of University of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject University of PennsylvaniaUniversity of Pennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Effective Altruism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Effective Altruism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relevant to effective altruism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Effective AltruismWikipedia:WikiProject Effective AltruismTemplate:WikiProject Effective AltruismEffective Altruism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Davidcpearce is trying to edit war me edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Davidcpearce has been undoing my revisions on all articles without regard for the content of the revision. I won't undo his undoing because I'd really like to avoid an edit war, but here's some evidence: he removed my internal link to the University of Pennsylvania School of Social Policy and Practice in this article. Absolutely no justification provided in his summaries. I don't think he even reads my edits before he undoes them. Instead he just says to "discuss on the talk page first". If he wants to discuss something on the talk page, he should start a section. Otherwise, there's no requirement to discuss before making an edit. We need external moderation here.Lrieber (talk) 00:14, 12 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Lrieber, many thanks for the editing work you are putting in. A plea first to discuss mass deletions in multiple articles with other editors isn't an edit war. Also, please bear in mind that setting up a separate user account "Pawg14"‎ for the sole purpose of deleting material with which you disagree for personal reasons is likely to raise eyebrows. --Davidcpearce (talk) 07:53, 12 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

How do you respond to the evidence I presented that you're deleting my edits without regard for content? Surely adding an internal link isn't so controversial that it requires discussion on the talk page. Also, I've addressed the Pawg14 account issue - see my userpage. I'd forgotten my login info for the other account, so I set up a new account, not realizing that this counts as sockpuppeting. I haven't used the alt account since. It's also bold to accuse me of making edits with an agenda, given that you've often worn your agenda on your sleeve. (If we're going to dredge up the past, you've been warned about brigading.) You have no idea what my personal views on these topics are. I take NPOV seriously, even when I might personally support a biased statement. See my edits on The Amityville Horror, John Derbyshire, and K. Eric Drexler, and my contribution to the talk page on right-to-work law. In the case of Drexler and right-to-work, I objected to non-neutral statements on both sides of the debate. Lrieber (talk) 13:41, 12 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hey LIla, I agree that some of your edits are very valuable and should definitely not be reverted. The problem is that often these are mixed with more controversial ones, so those of us who object to the latter are forced to go through the laborious process of telling the two apart. This is part of the reason why I think you should have sought consensus before deleting all this content: this would have allowed you to make the uncontroversial edits without fear that they would be reverted. Pablo Stafforini (talk) 22:28, 12 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nothing I did on this article was controversial. If I deleted sections, it's because I was re-organizing. I left most of the info intact and added some. Lrieber (talk) 00:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Center for High Impact Philanthropy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:36, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic