Talk:Celtrak

Tags

Refimprove = I've placed this tag because the current references (that I can access) are press releases. The one that is from a "blog" I can't access but, the majority of "blogs" are not considered reliable sources in accordance with WP:RS.

Advert = I've placed because the article itself reads like it is intended as a press release (perhaps even with bits copied verbatim).

I know the creator of the article may not agree but, items of this nature should also be addressed by others on this article before we enter into WP:OWN territory. Thanks. Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:25, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for your comments. The blog reference was to a reliable, established newspaper that for some reason uses blogspot for publishing online :-). In any event, I've replaced this with another from an environmental group that references the same topic.

Regarding the other references - I don't think any of them are actual press releases. Although there are some references to newspaper articles, I believe these constitute unbiased reportage from a variety of reliable independent media sources. I'd welcome discussion on this.

Regarding the Advert tag - The intention of the article is to be as informative as possible and I've endeavoured to be unbiased and write the article from a neutral perspective. Again, I'd welcome comments on how this could be improved if some of it sounds overtly promotional in tone.Colinky (talk) 13:28, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

As a guy who used to right them for a living believe me when I say they are essentially press releases. I'm sure such a "notable" company must have appropriate coverage elsewhere (though GNews only has press releases). As for the advertiness best suggestion I can offer is let someone else deal with it (that is after all part of the reason for tagging these things)Jasynnash2 (talk) 14:12, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

On the advert thing you have to remove "peacock" words and phrases. They aren't for instance the "industry leader", "premier", "unique", etc unless that is 100% sourced to a reliable 3rd party. Jasynnash2 (talk) 14:23, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Celtrak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060820060733/http://www.nuigalway.ie:80/press/research_matters/documents/research_matters_may2003.pdf to http://www.nuigalway.ie/press/research_matters/documents/research_matters_may2003.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071128034240/http://www.ee.nuigalway.ie/research/collaborator/9 to http://ee.nuigalway.ie/research/collaborator/9
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721123903/http://www.ebusinesslive.ie/newsletter/Story/4/1380/ob.html/235 to http://www.ebusinesslive.ie/newsletter/Story/4/1380/ob.html/235

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:46, 18 November 2016 (UTC)