Talk:Cello Concerto No. 9 (Boccherini)

Expansion

Maybe we could expand the "movements" part to a detailed description, like the Hayden Concerto In C Major article. Nuclearmound 02:47, 15 July 2006 (UTC)Nuclearmound

Best-known work?? Come now, surely the minuet from String Quintet Op13#5 is by far and away Boccherini's best-known work. Smyslov 13:50, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

?

This article is pretty confusing. Are we listening to the altered version or the original version today? Why wouldn't we have looked back to the original manuscript to restore the concerto in its original form? And if we don't have the original manuscript, how would we know the degree that it has been changed?

As the article now says, we certainly do have original manuscript. Basiatio (talk) 23:37, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Needs a rewrite. I think parts of the article were added at different times. The lede should state the existence of both versions. --DavidRF (talk) 16:38, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cello Concerto No. 9 (Boccherini). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20130412051632/http://www.yo-yoma.com/music/simply-baroque-ii-0 to http://www.yo-yoma.com/music/simply-baroque-ii-0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:27, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Naming

The original and the Grützmacher versions are definitely not known (or marked in ANY recordings) as Original and arr. Grützmacher. Take an original recording and a Grützmacher recording; literally no one can tell the titles apart. Baccherini (talk) 18:08, 21 January 2021 (UTC)