Talk:Causeway Bay
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
 | This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Causeway Bay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130128041857/http://www.ilovecwb.hk/ to http://www.ilovecwb.hk/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:15, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Re: Daniel Case edit
@Daniel Case: May I know why my edits were reverted? Thanks. [1] 218.189.215.212 (talk) 11:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- As I said when I blocked you, there were apparent connections to a long-term abuser who's used different accounts. I really can't go into it much more than that. Daniel Case (talk) 18:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Are you suggesting that I am a long-term abuser or is connected to a long-term abuse? Is there any valid proof? This is a serious allegation. Undo your effectively counterproductive act if it can't be demonstrated that I am, given that my edits were apparently nothing related to abuses – any reasonable people are able to tell. 218.189.215.212 (talk) 11:44, 15 February 2022 (UTC)