Talk:Castlevania: Lament of Innocence

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Harizotoh9 in topic Iga did not direct:

Fair use rationale for Image:Castlevania - Lament of Innocense (Gamecover).jpg edit

 

Image:Castlevania - Lament of Innocense (Gamecover).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:49, 2 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Interesting Story edit

The Origins of the Belmont Clan. Leon Belmont, all the Belmonts, hunt vampires, because of the love for a woman. So, Walter, cursed Leon's fiance Sarah with vampirism. Rather than turn, she sacrificed herself to create the vampire killer whip. Hence the title "Lament of Innocence."

Fair use rationale for Image:Castlevania - Lament of Innocense (Gamecover).jpg edit

 

Image:Castlevania - Lament of Innocense (Gamecover).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Critical Response edit

I deleted the line "Castlevania: Lament of Innocence has generally received positive reviews since its release."

Looking at the mixed reviews, a strong argument can be made against the word "positive". In fact, I see a somewhat "lukewarm" or "mediocre" critical response.

It's better just to let the numbers speak for themselves and let the readers make their interpretation. So, I deleted the line entirely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.102.77.56 (talk) 23:14, 10 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Letting the numbers speak for themselves, they told me that it did indeed recieve largely positive reviews. I won't argue the matter, since it's outside my expertise, but I would like to clarify those numbers, as they are currently more dificult to interpret than they should be. Larrythefunkyferret (talk) 06:59, 11 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

European naming edit

Wasn't this just named "Castlevania" in europe, maybe this should be mentioned? --94.193.66.60 (talk) 11:36, 27 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Indeed, it should be, as soon as you can find a reliable source to show that it's true. I'd put it in the development section, possibly the lead. Larrythefunkyferret (talk) 05:21, 28 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Gameplay edit

Why is there no mention anywhere whether this is a 2D platformer or a 3D game? Why so much detail if it's going to omit the most important bits? I'd add it myself, but that's the information I came to this article to find out in the first place! So I don't know. Can someone with more knowledge address this deficiency? It's pretty ridiculous that it exists at all, imho. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.6.12.204 (talk) 14:53, 9 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sources edit

Rapunzel-bellflower (talk) 22:18, 21 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Castlevania: Lament of Innocence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:17, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Iga did not direct: edit

Iga was producer/writer for the game, and he led the project in that role. His role as producer meant that he conceived the project, got approval from Konami, hired the team, and led the project, as well as writing the story. He did not direct it. The confusion comes from the gamespot piece saying that he "headed the project", and the editor assuming that meant directing. It's common for figures like Inafune, Ono, and Iga to be confused for directors since they do all the interviews and it's who the people associate with the series. For the record, Iga has only directed the obscure 2000 PlayStation RPG "Elder Gate". Harizotoh9 (talk) 21:26, 16 December 2018 (UTC)Reply