Talk:Cartorhynchus

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Lythronaxargestes in topic GA Review

Not an Ichthyosauriform? edit

According to http://pterosaurheresies.wordpress.com/2014/11/07/cartorhynchus-an-ichthyosaur-mimic-not-a-basal-ichthyosaur/ it is a pachypleurosaur, not a basal ichthyosauiform. 206.87.21.36 (talk) 22:12, 3 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

This website is not a reliable source: [1] When a different vew will be made and published in a reliable publication, as paleontology journals, it will be put in the article.--Rextron (talk) 22:18, 3 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cartorhynchus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dunkleosteus77 (talk · contribs) 00:58, 14 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Dunkleosteus77 edit

By quality, you mean FA/GA? I've personally worked on Elasmosaurus, Brancasaurus, and Dinocephalosaurus, and I know others have been promoted. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 01:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • "early-diverging" is might be better to just put "early"
Done in the lead, let me know if it should be done elsewhere too. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 02:55, 14 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Although the cause is shared, this is not the Tr-J. It is a minor extinction event that occurred at the Early Triassic-Middle Triassic boundary. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 01:23, 14 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
You should specify "by the Middle Triassic" or "at the beginning of the Middle Triassic"   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  14:16, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Done. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 18:54, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • "During further attempts to remove rock from between the closed jaws, an isolated tooth was discovered; the specimen had previously thought to have been toothless" this sentence is backwards   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  00:58, 14 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Reworded. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 02:55, 14 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Done. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 02:55, 14 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Not really. That process would articulate with the postfrontal I think. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 18:54, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • "Cartorhynchus had 31 pre-sacral vertebrae" you could also say "Excluding the tail, Cartorhynchus had 31 vertebrae"   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  14:16, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
This is not quite the same. You would include the sacrum in that count. Is "Excluding the tail and hip" better? Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 18:54, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Actually it might be better to just list them all out ("it has x number of neck vertebrae, y thoracic vertebrae, z lumbar...") at the beginning   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  01:02, 16 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
I'm not sure I can totally get around talking about presacrals though — see the presacral count discussion. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 02:10, 16 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
I know; if you list it all out like above, you've basically just defined presacral, and it's good info to include regardless   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  12:50, 16 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Done. I've just listed the (estimated) cervical and dorsal counts since the taxon doesn't have lumbar verts. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 01:15, 17 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
None proposed in the literature. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 18:54, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thought these were synonyms? Changed. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 18:54, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
I never really considered using homoplasy as an adverb before so I'm not sure what exactly it would be   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  01:02, 16 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Doesn't seem to do that on my screen. Added regardless. Lythronaxargestes (talk | contribs) 18:54, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply