Talk:Carter v. United States

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 12 February 2022 by reviewer Robertsky (talk · contribs).

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Supreme Court cases

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

There's not many secondary sources for this case because it's basically just an extension of Schmuck v. United States. It already has a section on that article page anyway. I'm not sure if it needed its own article. Smerdyakov911 (talk) 20:29, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

User:BD2412 User:Sulfurboy do yall think this should be its own article or should I combine this with the section on Schmuck v. United States? All secondary sources I found only reference the case as an example/footnote. Thanks, Smerdyakov911 (talk) 15:29, 10 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

I think there is coverage enough for this to be its own article, in the context of it being a full opinion of the Supreme Court (as compared to many instances where the Court gives short treatment to a case and remands it with reference to another recently decided case without examination of the facts). BD2412 T 16:06, 10 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic