Talk:Carrier Strike Group 1

Article revised

Article duly revised this date.Marcd30319 (talk) 23:14, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned references in Carrier Strike Group One

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Carrier Strike Group One's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "navytimes.com":

• From USS Carl Vinson (CVN-70): http://www.navytimes.com/news/2009/10/navy_strike_group_100109w/
• From USS Freedom (LCS-1): Refueling tops list of LCS crew challenges

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 16:12, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Overview

Please make any discussions, comments, and suggestions for the Overview section of this article here.Marcd30319 (talk) 23:45, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

2009 Operations

Please make any discussions, comments, and suggestions for the 2009 Operations section of this article here.Marcd30319 (talk) 23:45, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

2010 Operations

Please make any discussions, comments, and suggestions for the 2010 Operations section of this article here.Marcd30319 (talk) 23:45, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

2010-2011 Operations: WESTPAC deployment

Please make any discussions, comments, and suggestions for the 2010-2011 Operations: WESTPAC Deployment section of this article here.Marcd30319 (talk) 23:45, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

No link to WW2 heritage

I'm prepared to delete the whole section about CarDiv 1's activities during WW2 and before because I've been able to find no reliable source that says that the modern unit is a descendant of the WW2 unit. GlobalSecurity.org does link the two, but that's not RS. I thought I'd canvass for some opinions first before I do so.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:24, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

This is the second comment of this type you've made. However, see the talk page of CSG 7: there are clear NAvy claims that the CarDivs/CArGrus/CSGs are linked. However I'm not too worried about that, but much more importantly, why are you considering deleting it? Surely establishing Carrier Division 1 would be a much better alternative. Buckshot06 (talk) 03:47, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carrier Strike Group 1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120322235837/http://www.royalnavy.mod.uk:80/News-and-Events/Latest-News/2012/March/20/120320-Daring-Carriers to http://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/News-and-Events/Latest-News/2012/March/20/120320-Daring-Carriers

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:45, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Historical Background section

In the line "In June 1973, Carrier Division 1 was redesignated Carrier Group 1 (CarGru 1), and in January 1974, it was located at North Island, California.[19] " the text North Island hyperlinks to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Island which is an article about the New Zealand island, while the text itself refers to the Naval Air Station North Island (NASNI) located on the Coronado Peninsula at Pier 'L' in San Diego, California.

Unfortunately, I am unsure how to fix it.

Schwackmaster (talk) 07:58, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

References

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Carrier Strike Group 1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110514220101/http://www.abma-usn.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=76%3Aargentina-united-states-in-joint-exercise&catid=1%3Alatest-news&Itemid=50 to http://www.abma-usn.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=76%3Aargentina-united-states-in-joint-exercise&catid=1%3Alatest-news&Itemid=50
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/News-and-Events/Latest-News/2012/March/20/120320-Daring-Carriers

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:39, 31 July 2017 (UTC)