Talk:Carlota S. Smith

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because I spent half an hour putting together this short entry, based on the sources that are listed at the end of the reference. While some phrases were close to the originals, most had been reworked. I've just reworked some more. I hope the page now meets your requirements. I think those who flag entries for copyright infringement should be required to point out the sentences they are concerned about. That is, they should have to justify themselves the way we who are accused of copyright infringement have to. Ljdowning (talk) 19:26, 11 March 2018 (UTC)LauraReply

The amount of overlap and sections of concern are available on the copyvio report, which is linked on the deletion template on the article. Have a look at this revision and click on the link that says "Copyvios report" to view the overlap. I have done some additional clean-up and the current version is okay from a copyright point of view. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:39, 11 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your help with this. Ljdowning (talk) 05:39, 12 March 2018 (UTC)LauraReply

Add topic