This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Why does an article like this need sources? Flagging such a basic article, with entirely non-inflammatory statements ("However, canned responses to customer complaints may make the customer even more dissatisfied." It's a perfectly reasonable statement that does not require previously published support to give it credibility.) is just a waste of the community resources. It distracts from articles that genuinely need support. I am not the author of the article, I'm just a frequent reader who gets annoyed with the unnecessary, liberal flagging of articles by editors who could be spending their time actually researching articles and providing relevant references or editing with appropriate counterpoints with supporting references. (Which makes their counter-arguments more credible.) 75.162.202.226 (talk) 05:04, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
All content in articles should cite reliable sources so that it can be verified. That is Wikipedia's policy. --Joshua Issac (talk) 19:15, 27 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
