This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Should we make sure that both clubs are listed alongside each player in the roster? hoopydinkConas tá tú? 21:29, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
I think both teams should be included, as the official NA4 site tries to list both. Also one of the press releases talks about how the NA4 is comprised of the best players in the Super League. Currently we have a mix, some players have their home club, and other players have their Super League Team listed.--Am rockstar 20:04, 18 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
I added the Super League Teams (where available) but it threw off the format of the second column in the table, when I took that column out...it now looks a bit long. What do you think? Feel free to revert if it looks too long.Am rockstar 20:35, 18 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
Great job in adding information on each player's clubs! I think that'll be an important addition. I inserted columns as it had been previously so the "Current Squad" section length is now cut in half. hoopydinkConas tá tú? 22:16, 18 August 2006 (UTC)Reply
