Talk:Camille (1936 film)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Fair use rationale for Image:Camille 5.jpg
edit
Image:Camille 5.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
La Traviata
editI think the article should mention that the story is also well known as the opera LA TRAVIATA, also based on Dumas' play. 2601:C2:201:4612:1908:164E:753B:981E (talk) 22:57, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Manon Lescaut
editwhere, if at all, would it be proper to add a note about the reference to Manon Lescaut? --Vm0d (talk) 14:59, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Should there be a mention of this film being shown (when they go to Radio City) in the film Annie? Or does that border on extemporaneous trivia, and thus, doesn't belong in the article? --MicahBrwn (talk) 21:28, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Superfluous
editI'm not sure the anecdote "On watching a scene in the film where Garbo is at a theater..." belongs in this article at all, but it certainly makes no sense in the "Critical response" section. 2601:181:300:1E53:0:0:0:74 (talk) 01:03, 11 September 2022 (UTC)