Talk:Calonectria pteridis
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Extraordinary Writ in topic Requested move 4 February 2022
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | On 4 February 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Cylindrocladium pteridis to Calonectria ptederis. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 4 February 2022
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:33, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Cylindrocladium pteridis → Calonectria ptederis – "Cylindrocladium ptederis" is the outdated name. The correct and updated name is Calonectria ptederis. I believe the page should be moved to Calonectria ptederis, and the current title should redirect to the page. --192.68.163.182 (talk) 14:38, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support "Calonectria pteridis", see Calonectria pteridis in MycoBank. YorkshireExpat (talk) 08:49, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support, the current title should be changed to redirect to Calonectria pteridis. I did notice though that you wrote "ptederis" instead of pteridis. Simple mistake, I'm assuming. --APGL07 (talk) 04:07, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- @APGL07: right! I must have copied/pasted from here! I will edit my support comment. Will probably have to be redone. YorkshireExpat (talk) 17:18, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.