Talk:Caligula... The Untold Story

Latest comment: 5 years ago by 188.2.144.141 in topic Pornography!?

Running time

edit

The running time information should be moved to the release section. Per infobox standards, we only have the running time of the initial release in the infobox. If that can't be deciphered, I would remove it there and place the rest of the runtime info in the release section. Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:30, 31 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ellipsis in title

edit

What's Wikipedia's stance on this? Should there be spaces between the periods? What about before and after the ellipsis?

I'm new here, and I apologize if this is answered elsewhere.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Widepepper (talkcontribs) 16:36, 30 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Dear Widepepper;  
Thank you for your contributions and for asking advice on the correct approach.
The agreed convention among Wikipedia editors is documented in MOS:ELLIPSIS. As you will see, it is: Wikipedia's style for an ellipsis is three unspaced dots (...); do not use the precomposed ellipsis character (…) or three dots separated by spaces (. . .). I hope this helped.
Also, please sign your posts, using four tildes (~~~~), which will automatically append your username and a time stamp. When you reply to another editor, please indent your text, using one or more initial colons (:), each colon representing one level of indentation. Each comment should be indented one more level than the comment it replies to, which may or may not be the preceding comment. You can find more details by consulting WP:THREAD. Good luck and best wishes.
With kind regards;
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk)(guestbook) 19:49, 1 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, Pdebee, for links to these guides. I'll certainly consult this material when I have any stylistic questions.
PS: I hope I correctly formatted this reply!
Widepepper (talk) 20:14, 1 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
Dear Widepepper;  
You’re most welcome, and well done!  
I’ve now also restored the ellipses as they were, and added a Welcome! Template on your own talk page earlier on, where you will find general pointers to help new joiners. Best wishes of success here and thank you for your contributions.
With kind regards;
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk)(guestbook) 23:41, 1 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Pornography!?

edit

According to the French wiki, the hardcore version runs 125 min, the softcore version runs 102 min., meaning the hardcore footage lasts maximally 22/23 min. So ~22 min (including sexual VIOLENCE, zoophilia and orgies) + ~100 min (including non-hardcore material and strong physical VIOLENCE/GORE) = EXPLOITATION film (with elements of the other genres, INCLUDING porn footage). I don't understand why this film is classified as just pornography. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.2.144.141 (talk) 00:41, 6 September 2019 (UTC)Reply