Talk:California Hard

Jazz Low‑importance

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Was "Round Midnight" on the original LP? Don't think so. --ND 01:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

You know, I'm not sure. I just have the cd. Great tunes, btw. Coker is one of those jazz pianists that deserves rekindled interest. Do you have the actual LP, or have a reliable source that states it was not on the original LP? On my cd, it makes no mention that it was a bonus track or included only in the reissue. (Mind meal 01:53, 10 July 2007 (UTC))Reply

I have the LP but it's not in a very accessible place at the moment. But I am pretty sure "Round Midnight" wasn't on it. --ND 02:48, 10 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Actually you are right, as my album sleeve does say "There is also the added bonus Thelonious Monk's classic 'Round Midnight, played here as an unaccompanied piano solo, a perfect coda to the session. I'll include now in the article that the song only appears on the CD reissue. (Mind meal 04:34, 10 July 2007 (UTC))Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:DoloCoker.jpg edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image:DoloCoker.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:54, 27 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic