Talk:California's 47th congressional district
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on California's 47th congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090203072316/http://sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2002_general/congress.pdf to http://sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2002_general/congress.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081127061822/http://sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2006_general/congress.pdf to http://sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2006_general/congress.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081221042514/http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2008_general/23_34_us_reps.pdf to http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2008_general/23_34_us_reps.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131019044155/http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2012-general/12-us-reps.pdf to http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2012-general/12-us-reps.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131019044155/http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2012-general/12-us-reps.pdf to http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2012-general/12-us-reps.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:10, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on California's 47th congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110810210911/http://sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2006_general/ssov/gov_by_cd.pdf to http://sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2006_general/ssov/gov_by_cd.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110810210917/http://sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2006_general/ssov/us_sen_by_cd.pdf to http://sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2006_general/ssov/us_sen_by_cd.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110810211138/http://sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2004_general/ssov/us_senate_ssov_congressional.pdf to http://sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2004_general/ssov/us_senate_ssov_congressional.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101111170552/http://sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2002_general/ssov/gov_cong.pdf to http://sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2002_general/ssov/gov_cong.pdf
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2004_general/us20reps%20all%20formatted.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:18, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on California's 47th congressional district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110601211838/http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2010-general/ssov/governor-congressional.pdf to http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2010-general/ssov/governor-congressional.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110601224321/http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2010-general/ssov/us-senate-congressional-dists.pdf to http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2010-general/ssov/us-senate-congressional-dists.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090211114252/http://www.2008racetracker.com/page/CA-47 to http://www.2008racetracker.com/page/CA-47
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110520020308/http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2004_general/ssov/pres_general_ssov_congressional.pdf to http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2004_general/ssov/pres_general_ssov_congressional.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110520020512/http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2003_special/ssov/recall_ques_cd.pdf to http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2003_special/ssov/recall_ques_cd.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110520020528/http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2003_special/ssov/gov_cd.pdf to http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2003_special/ssov/gov_cd.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110520021824/http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2000_general/ssov/cong_dis.pdf to http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2000_general/ssov/cong_dis.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110520021829/http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2000_general/ssov/us_senate_cong_dis.pdf to http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2000_general/ssov/us_senate_cong_dis.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110520072810/http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2010-general/58-united-states-representative.pdf to http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2010-general/58-united-states-representative.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:12, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
TRIVIA edit
THERES IS UNNECESSARY TRIVIA IN THIS ARTICLE, IT MUST BE PURGED (PLS LETS REMOVE CA-47 IN POPULAR CULTURE SECTION), (UNEXPLICABLY STUCK ON ALL CAPS) 107.190.33.254 (talk) 00:49, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Why must "trivia" be purged? If it is indeed trivia. Which I believe it isn't. If correctly sourced it should stay in my opinion. Note that I didn't actually originally write it so this is not me defending my own work. Benawu2 (talk) 01:50, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Trivia's definition doesn't mention anything about "well sourced". But let's first agree on a definition of trivia.
- "details or information that are not important" (Cambridge dictionary)
- "unimportant matters, details or information" (Oxford dictionary)
- Trivia makes pages too long and makes unessential information appear more useful than it really is.
- Now let's just see whether this information passes the test.
- For starters, it's a particular detail (we can agree on that, right?), since it isn't the focal point of the article, but that doesn't prove that it is trivia. On top of proving that it is a detail, I have to show that it is an irrelevant one for the purposes of this article. Let's agree that this is about the ELECTORAL DISTRICT, so important information would include : where it is, who represented it and obviously election results. Now let's agree on something else : we don't have a "in popular culture" section for every article of a job held by an important character in "the west wing" mentioning that this job is held by an important character in " the west wing", and get this : THERE ARE reliable sources showing that this is the case for all of these sections, and yet we STILL DONT DO IT. 107.190.33.254 (talk) 21:15, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Trivia makes pages too long and makes unessential information appear more useful than it really is. - This is the bit we just don't agree about. I think it adds a quirky, interesting piece to an otherwise relatively dry article. Benawu2 (talk) 01:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Alright, since you insist, but I still feel like it is needlessly long, how about this as a neutral meeting point : "California's 47th congressional district was the scene of a congressional election (won by a deceased Democrat), and later a congressional special election (won by the Republican incumbent), featured in several episodes of the political drama The West Wing." 107.190.33.254 (talk) 13:45, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Agreed. Huzzah! Benawu2 (talk) 21:20, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Indeed, Huzzah! I will now make the edit. 107.190.33.254 (talk) 14:26, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- Agreed. Huzzah! Benawu2 (talk) 21:20, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Alright, since you insist, but I still feel like it is needlessly long, how about this as a neutral meeting point : "California's 47th congressional district was the scene of a congressional election (won by a deceased Democrat), and later a congressional special election (won by the Republican incumbent), featured in several episodes of the political drama The West Wing." 107.190.33.254 (talk) 13:45, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Trivia makes pages too long and makes unessential information appear more useful than it really is. - This is the bit we just don't agree about. I think it adds a quirky, interesting piece to an otherwise relatively dry article. Benawu2 (talk) 01:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)