Talk:Calero Reservoir

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Lakes

	Lakes portal Calero Reservoir is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Capacity edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Looking at this source http://alert.valleywater.org/rescurr.txt the capacity looks to me like it is significantly under reported. Im'm not an expert. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sorenriise (talk • contribs) 12:42, 30 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Found the problem with the stats -- there is a Caldero-Sacramento reservoir (http://www.water.ca.gov/damsafety/docs/Juris(A-G)1.pdf) and the stats from that were used for the Santa Clara name sake -- fixed and created dummy link to the Sacramento namesake. Sorenriise (talk) 13:00, 30 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for straightening this out. I'll create an article about Lake Calero, then add hatnotes to both articles to help prevent further confusion. —Stepheng3 (talk) 16:02, 30 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

dam retrofit edit

Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The retrofit is not scheduled to begin until at least 2031. I'll update the article to reflect that. JustGaro (talk) 06:49, 31 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

It's done. JustGaro (talk) 02:13, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic