 | A fact from Cable 243 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 August 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on August 24, 2010, August 24, 2011, August 24, 2014, and August 24, 2023. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Who is Rusk?
editThink that this should be addressed. His name is mentioned 12 times, but there is no link to who he is or what role in the government he served. Think this is Dean Rusk. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.235.39.236 (talk) 13:59, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
'preparation of the cable' section
editThe last paragraph clearly needs to be edited to be put back into its proper place in the section with a coherent sentence at the beginning. I do not have sufficient knowledge of the subject to do this correctly. Hopefully someone else reading this article is able to do this sometime today, seeing as it is linked on today's homepage.CFnavymars (talk) 09:34, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
I stopped reading
editThe "article" claims, but doesn't cite any sources, that "the cable declared that Washington would no longer tolerate Nhu remaining in a position of power and ordered Lodge to pressure Diem to remove his brother. It said that if Diem refused, the Americans would explore the possibility for alternative leadership in South Vietnam. In effect, the cable authorized Lodge to give the green light to Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN) officers to launch a coup against Diem if he did not willingly remove Nhu from power."
The cable doesn't implicitly or explicitly mention a coup, nor does it allude to any "green light." This is conspiracy theory, at best.--Lacarids (talk) 23:24, 29 February 2012 (UTC)