Talk:CNFE Clairefontaine

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Calidum in topic Requested move 12 November 2021

The Football 1000 Destubbing Challenge edit

Rewrote article as part of the The Football 1000 Destubbing Challenge and reassessed as Start. --dashiellx (talk) 15:32, 12 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 12 November 2021 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved (closed by non-admin page mover) Calidum 18:16, 19 November 2021 (UTC)Reply


CNFE ClairefontaineFrench Women's Football Pole – Academy is not longer in Clairefontaine and there are valid sources saying the name of the academy has changed since it moved from Clairefontaine to Paris. dashiellx (talk) 15:37, 12 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose: Even though it is no longer based in Clairefontaine, the women's elite academy run by the FFF is still commonly referred to as Clairefontaine, so per WP:COMMONNAME it should not be moved. Even if it were to be moved, it shouldn't be moved to the title nominated here; Pole is not the correct translation for the French word pôle in this context. Seany91 (talk) 08:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
When I had this typed up in my editor, I wanted it to be French Women's Football Pôle as I wasn't 100% sure of the exact translation, but when I copied it over I guess the accent was lost and I didn't notice. When I think Clairefontaine, I think the men's academy as that is the institution I am more familiar with, but I definitely see your POV. --dashiellx (talk) 13:56, 15 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 13:16, 14 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose - none of the apparent 'valid sources' have actually been provided supporting the name change... GiantSnowman 13:19, 14 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
Typical response. --dashiellx (talk) 13:56, 15 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.