Talk:CNBC Ticker

Latest comment: 11 years ago by 188.57.10.41 in topic Why the CNBC ticker

Criticism section needed

edit

Many people do not read the ticker symbols at all. They fly by too fast and are just an annoyance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.240.146.254 (talk) 04:38, 5 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I agree. 188.57.10.41 (talk) 13:51, 21 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Why the CNBC ticker

edit

How is the CNBC ticker different from other tickers? — Randall Bart (talk) 07:07, 13 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree it is too fast. Bloomberg TV's one is slower. 188.57.10.41 (talk) 13:52, 21 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

History

edit

Why don't we put a section that discusses in detail what the ticker has looked like? --58.69.64.221 (talk) 02:17, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fonts

edit

Can you please tell us what are the fonts that had been used for CNBC Tickers... 210.4.42.191 (talk) 08:37, 5 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

The image Image:Cnbcgfx3.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:09, 20 May 2008 (UTC)Reply