Talk:CMS (law firm)
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was edited to contain a total or partial translation of CMS (Unternehmen) from the German Wikipedia. Consult the history of the original page to see a list of its authors. |
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Major Update edit
I have updated the CMS Cameron McKenna page to make it inline with the wiki pages of other law firms.
If there are any issues with the page or any updates then please contact me.
Many thanks, Alex — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexHarrisCMS (talk • contribs) 12:37, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 18 January 2018 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: MOVED
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang → CMS (law firm) – Per WP:COMMONNAME as the firm is known by its trading name (CMS) and not its full legal name. jamacfarlane (talk) 00:30, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
COI edit
I've added proper disclosure for involved users. (I'm sorry that this is done afterwards.) In order to support cleanup, I'd suggest to change the header template from {{undisclosed paid}} to {{COI}} if that's acceptable for the community. --- JD at CMS (talk) 07:09, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Since you're taking action and the usernames seem obvious (and since editors were no longer around when they were told about the required disclosure), I don't think it was purposefully undisclosed paid editing. So, I also think it's fine to replace it with just a "COI" tag. If anyone disagrees, feel free to add it back (I'm not an expert here). Also, thanks JD at CMS for complying with the UPE policy. Best, - Whisperjanes (talk) 02:28, 24 September 2020 (UTC)