Talk:C. Ledyard Blair House
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Epicgenius in topic Math inconsistency
![]() | A fact from C. Ledyard Blair House appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 June 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Desertarun (talk) 21:13, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the 66-room C. Ledyard Blair House on New York City's Fifth Avenue was sold and demolished barely a decade after its completion? Source: "Buys Blair Mansion at a Record Figure; Builder Pays $170 a Square Foot for Upper 5th Av. Site for Big Apartment House". The New York Times. January 22, 1926
- ALT1:... that the decade-old C. Ledyard Blair House in New York City was sold in 1926 for a then-record price to make way for apartments? Source: The New York Times. January 22, 1926
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/WMRD
5x expanded by DACC23 (talk) and Epicgenius (talk). Nominated by Epicgenius (talk) at 20:36, 15 May 2021 (UTC).
- 5x expanded and nominated the same day and is therefore new enough and long enough. the first hook is interesting and I for a good kick out of it, and it would appeal to a broader audience due to its simplicity. Would consider dropping "66-room" as it kind of draws attention away from the fun fact aspect of it, but no biggie. It's cited to a reliable source and NPOV is considered. QPQ completed. Good Job! --Panini!🥪 01:50, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Math inconsistency
edit33.5 feet multiplied by 175 feet =/ 7300 Annonynnonymous (talk) 08:32, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, a site of 7300 square feet is improbable given these dimensions. I've changed it now. – Epicgenius (talk) 05:43, 19 February 2023 (UTC)