Talk:Ca Mau Airport

(Redirected from Talk:Cà Mau Airport)
Latest comment: 4 months ago by BegbertBiggs in topic Requested move 5 December 2023

Requested move 5 December 2023 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (closed by non-admin page mover) BegbertBiggs (talk) 22:49, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply



– Non-diacritic name, to harmonize with other airport names in Vietnam (see Category:Airports in Vietnam). Đại Việt quốc (talk) 18:00, 1 December 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). – robertsky (talk) 14:40, 5 December 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. BegbertBiggs (talk) 14:43, 14 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

There was a renaming in 2010 to add the diacritics, with an edit summary about consistency with other Cà Mau renames, so this seems like a WP:PCM. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 20:36, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
@BarrelProof: That's because they were not aware of the fact that almost all of other airport names are still diacriticless. The airport name should be consistent with other airport names, not with other city or town name. This move completely broke the consistency. For example, Buôn Ma Thuột and Buon Ma Thuot Airport, Đồng Hới and Dong Hoi Airport. Why did no one move these two titles to diacritics for consistency with the city names? So the solution here would be: either move all of the others to diacritics, or move these back to diacriticless. I'm fine with either. Đại Việt quốc (talk) 19:02, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
@BarrelProof and Đại Việt quốc: courtesy ping. – robertsky (talk) 14:43, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.