Talk:Burnout Dominator

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Djchallis in topic Reception section

Update edit

Can someone PLEASE update this? It's almost a month after its release and it still says "will"! Misteryoshi 00:06, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Links for songs edit

Most of the songs in the list are linked to articles that are totally irrelevant. The B'z song Friction was linked to the physics concept. I suggest we remove the links, because some of them have no articles at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sergeant.cross (talkcontribs) 03:27, 14 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Criterion Correction edit

I made a correction to the developers of the game. EA UK did work on the game, but Criterion was also listed and they did not work on this particular Burnout game, as they were working on Burnout Paradise at the time. So I changed that and added some info as to why in the first paragraph, along with references. Pink Moonlight 04:39, November 25, 2007 (UET)

This contradicts the official listings. The manual lists Criterion as the, and I quote, "makers of this game." The EA site also lists Criterion as the Developer. Official EA Burnout Dominator page The reference you cite above is a throwaway comment in an opinion piece and / or third-party site at best. However, I did find a press release on a fan site that mentions this information. I have added a reference to that also. Additionally, trying to find any information on EA UK sends you in circles with articles referencing themselves.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

Fair use rationale for Image:Burnoutdominator.jpg edit

 

Image:Burnoutdominator.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:03, 27 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Reception section edit

Surely listing IGN's scores for the game isn't appropriate content for the reception section. The section was empty before, so clearly IGN's scores have been added so there's something there, but I think it looks messy and unprofessional. On the assumption that nobody updates this page and this comment may go unnoticed for months, I'm going to remove the section. If someone disagrees with me and wants to put it back, go for it. Djchallis (talk) 14:07, 21 July 2011 (UTC)Reply