Talk:Bull Stone House

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York (state): Hudson Valley

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Hudson Valley (assessed as Low-importance).

A fact from Bull Stone House appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 August 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Bull Stone House property (pictured) in New York, is home to the only surviving New World Dutch barn?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/August.

Wikipedia

Missing Person Page/Bad Link edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Sarah Wells link goes to a Canadian Athlete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.248.3.1 (talk) 21:42, 6 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

moved here to keep discussion at the relevant page:

Image placement in Bull Stone House

Thanks for the copyediting, but I moved the picture back (albeit smaller). There's no rule that says they all have to be on the right (in fact, I much prefer alternating placement because studies have demonstrated repeatedly that it improves readability since it mirrors the sweep of our eyes across a page), and I would IAR that idea anyway where an infobox is concerned. An image should always be as close as possible in the text to what it illustrates ... having it down by the footnotes is completely useless, and looks like a fifth wheel.

Also, was it really necessary to constantly reiterate "Bull and Wells Stone House"? First, the property's official title in the National Register is what the article is titled, and the sign on the nearby road says exactly the same thing. But over and above any issues with the titling, constantly reusing the title phrase is hitting the reader over the head. "Bull Stone House" is in big letters at the top of the page; I think most readers know which house is meant. Daniel Case 02:02, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the notation regarding your changes to my edit. I regularly move photographs to the area in the article where the text discusses the subject of the photograph. The reason I moved this photograph, however, is because it skews copy in the article with its placement where you have it.

Now, to the right of the uppermost margin of the smaller photograph are two words Bull, a and below the smaller photograph with a great gap of white space -- the paragraph continues, stonemason, met and married Wells, a fellow immigrant to the Wawayanda Patent (much of the present day towns of Goshen, Hamptonburgh, Minisink, and Warwick) while they were both working for the patent proprietors. Building the house was a joint effort between husband and wife. which is forced because the word stonemason will not fit between the photograph and the information box. Your preferred layout is a designer's nightmare... but if you are insensitive to such professional standards... leave it skewed. Your arrangement makes it especially difficult to understand the text.

Please remember that no one owns an article here and other editors may adapt it to their own style so long as they do not insert errors. 83d40m 22:50, 4 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bull Stone House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:36, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic