Talk:Buellton, California

Comment

Should be some reference to the Split-pea soup thing, whose signs were up and down the coastal highway for many miles for many years (not sure if this is still the case)... AnonMoos (talk) 03:23, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

They're still there: the one on 101 east of Gaviota may be the only billboard in all of southern Santa Barbara County (grandfathered in during the billboard ordinance sometime in the 1970s, which prohibited all signage above a certain size, and in natural locations). I know there's at least one, and probably two, on 101 north of Buellton as well. Antandrus (talk) 03:30, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Anyway, I linked to the official Split-pea soup site, since it seems to be Buellton's main claim to fame (though the site's main page doesn't seem to have been updated in over five years...). AnonMoos (talk) 08:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Buellton, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141103002921/http://www.calafco.org/docs/Cities_by_incorp_date.doc to http://www.calafco.org/docs/Cities_by_incorp_date.doc
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fprod%2Fwww%2Fdecennial.html to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130616234239/http://reevesranchvineyard.com/ to http://www.reevesranchvineyard.com
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130421141927/http://www.terravant.com:80/ to http://www.terravant.com/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://buellton.ca.schoolwebpages.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:54, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Removed Misleading or Inaccurate Statements

There were a few sentences that seemed misleading or not accurate, so I've removed them. Namely:

• "Their current advertising looks the same." AFAIK, Anderson's current advertising does not look like the image.
• "Buellton was in 2004 was one of the fastest-growing towns in central Santa Barbara County." This is sort of a non-statement as there really aren't that many towns in "central Santa Barbara County" which is a pretty narrow set. It's also unsupported (and I suspect not true).
• "Unlike most communities in Santa Barbara County, Buellton has a majority of voters registered as Republicans, although now the town has a plurality Republican registration." I don't have access to the source but, if this was true in 2000, I would be surprised if it is true today. If someone wants to add this back in, please add a better source.

DocFreeman24 (talk) 16:51, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

References

Proposed Merger

I think Buellton Union Elementary School District should be merged into this page since it is not notable enough on its own to warrant its own page. I'll plan to take a crack at doing so in the coming days, absent objection. DocFreeman24 (talk) 03:44, 21 October 2020 (UTC)