 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
RealScreen edit
If you want to demonstrate that RealScreen is important enough to be singled out in the company's article for special levels of detail that Playback, KidScreen and Strategy aren't also getting and/or actually earning its own standalone article, then you can't source the content to its own self-published web presence — to demonstrate that it's actually notable, you would need to show that it has been the subject of coverage in sources other than itself, like actual journalism about it in other non-Brunico publications or books. We also don't bold the magazine titles that don't have articles just because there are redirects in place — per WP:BOLDLEAD, the only thing that gets bolded in the introduction of Brunico's article is the first appearance of Brunico's own name. Bearcat (talk) 15:53, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Bearcat. Strategy and Playback already have their own articles. I was bolding the titles of the other two because there are redirects for each, with many links to them, especially Realscreen.
- "If an article is about an event involving a subject about which there is no main article, especially if the article is the target of a redirect, the subject should be in bold".
- I have no interest in Brunico nor time to create another article, but Realscreen has worldwide interest to film-makers, and their awards are notable - it's more than just a magazine. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 23:54, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- Firstly, notability is always about the amount of reliable source coverage the subject has in sources other than itself. Nothing can ever be notable without that.
Secondly, this article is not about an event.
And incidentally, you're not surprising me with the "revelation" that there are a lot of links to the RealScreen redirect; I was the creator of a big chunk of them, because Canadian documentary films are one of my domains. But that doesn't have much to do with it; go back to point the first about how notability always requires reliable source coverage. Bearcat (talk) 02:31, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
- Firstly, notability is always about the amount of reliable source coverage the subject has in sources other than itself. Nothing can ever be notable without that.